Abstract
Objective: To quantitatively determine in 7 different commercial brands of composite resins that mimic dentin (Filtek Z350XT® 3M ESPE™, Miris 2® Coltène™, Empress Direct® Ivoclar Vivadent™, Opallis® FGM™, TPH Spectra® DentsplySirona™ Tetric N Ceram® Ivoclar Vivadent™, Brilliant Everglow® Coltène™) coded as Vita Clásica Vita Zahnfabrik™’s A2 and A3 or an equivalent dye, the difference in color (ΔE) with the Vita Classic scale for that codification on a black or white background.
Materials and methods: In vitro descriptive study. 7 composite resin brands (N 35) in A3 and A2 tones were used, 10 mm diameter and 2 mm thick discs were made, measured with spectrophotometry on two backgrounds with Vita Easyshade V® Vita Zahnfabrik ™ instrument. The values obtained in CIELAB were analyzed obtaining ΔE. An ANOVA 2 factor test (a0.05) was performed.
Results: The ΔE closest to the Vita Classic® scale was given by TPH Spectra® DentsplySirona ™ A2 (1.02 ± .69), the largest ΔE was Filtek Z350XT® 3M ESPE ™ (69.31 ± .50).
Conclusion: There are clear differences between composite resins of the studied brands and the Vita Classical scale. On a black background 71.4% of all samples and on a white background 92.8% are on a ΔE 5, meaning that the differences between their dyes are considered clinically unacceptable. None of the composite resin brands meet the colorimetric characteristics when compared to the Vita Classic scale.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Applied Sciences in Dentistry
