Comparison between two techniques of harvesting connective tissue grafts in radicular coverage surgery.

Authors

  • Daniela Encalada Guerrero Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Valparaíso
  • Guido Fuentes Arribada Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Valparaíso
  • María de los Ángeles Ruíz Berger Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Valparaíso
  • Carla Rojas Gonzalez Facultad de Odontología Universidad de Valparaíso

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.0.2575

Keywords:

Root coverage, connective tissue graft, de-epithelialization

Abstract

Objective: To compare root coverage surgery results using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCGT) and de-epithelialized gingival graft (DGG) in Miller Class I and II gingival recessions. 

Material and Methods: A review of the literature published in the last 5 years, with articles selected from PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using the search key " de epithelialized gingival graft AND subepithelial connective tissue graft.” 

Results: A total of 250 articles were obtained. 245 publications were excluded through a manual filter because they were duplicated or did not meet the established criteria, obtaining 5 articles included in this review.  

Conclusion: Both harvesting techniques offer satisfactory results of coverage of root recessions. However, there is not enough evidence to state that one technique is superior to the other.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-26

How to Cite

Encalada Guerrero, D., Fuentes Arribada, G., Ruíz Berger, M. de los Ángeles, & Rojas Gonzalez, C. (2020). Comparison between two techniques of harvesting connective tissue grafts in radicular coverage surgery. Applied Sciences in Dentistry, 1. https://doi.org/10.22370/asd.2020.1.0.2575

Issue

Section

Reviews